Injuries from sharp objects in the healthcare sector

Sharps injuries in the healthcare sector are punctures, cuts, and wounds suffered by individuals working in hospitals, health centers, nursing homes, laboratories, emergency services, and other healthcare or social care facilities when handling needles, catheters, lancets, scalpels, glass, and other sharp instruments contaminated with blood or other biological fluids. Their severity lies not so much in the wound itself as in the risk of transmission of biological agents, primarily hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency viruses, as well as other infections, and in the psychological and organizational impact they generate. The highest-risk situations include needle recapping, manual removal of needles from syringes, disposal in full or inadequate containers, procedures involving agitated patients, transfer of instruments in the operating room, lack of readily available sharps containers, and time pressure. In the European Union, Directive 2010/32/EU implemented the framework agreement between social partners in the healthcare sector on the prevention of injuries caused by sharp and pointed instruments, and in Spain Order ESS/1451/2013, in force since August 1, 2013, incorporated it into the legal system: it requires risk assessment in accordance with Royal Decree 664/1997 on biological agents, prohibits with immediate effect the recapping of needles, requires the provision of medical devices with integrated safety mechanisms and the withdrawal of conventional ones, establishes specific training, free vaccination against agents with an effective vaccine, procedures for notification, investigation and follow-up of accidents with medical care and post-exposure prophylaxis, and the participation of workers’ representatives.

In short

Needlesticks, cuts, and wounds from needles, scalpels, lancets, and other instruments contaminated with blood or bodily fluids in hospitals, health centers, nursing homes, and laboratories pose a risk of transmission of hepatitis B and C and HIV. Directive 2010/32/EU and Order ESS/1451/2013 require risk assessments in accordance with Royal Decree 664/1997, prohibit the recapping of needles, mandate the provision of devices with safety mechanisms and containers at the point of use, and establish training, free vaccination, notification, investigation, medical care, post-exposure prophylaxis, and follow-up of accidents, with the participation of workers’ representatives.

Content
  1. Situations and risk factors
  2. Obligations of Order ESS/1451/2013
  3. Effective preventive measures
  4. Organizational application: how to prevent injuries from sharp objects
  5. Limits and common mistakes
  6. Practical example
  7. Regulatory and reference framework
  8. Related concepts
  9. References

A–Z dictionary →

Situations and risk factors

  • Risky practices. Recapping of needles, manual removal of needles and blades, transport of instruments without protection and disposal in full, distant or inadequate containers.
  • Procedures. Extractions, injections, IV insertion, suturing, surgery, wound care, punctures, and handling of samples and waste.
  • Environments and people. Emergency rooms, operating rooms, critical care units, home care, and agitated or uncooperative patients.
  • Organization. Time pressure, workload, shifts, lack of training and safety devices, and absence of containers at the point of use.
  • Personnel especially exposed. Nursing, medicine, laboratory staff, cleaning and waste management, and temporary or trainee staff.
  • Biological agents. Hepatitis B and C viruses and human immunodeficiency virus, among others, with different transmission risks depending on the agent and the type of exposure.

Obligations of Order ESS/1451/2013

Employers in the public and private healthcare and hospital sector must assess the risks of injuries from sharp and pointed instruments in accordance with Royal Decree 664/1997, taking into account the nature of the exposure, the organization of work, and the qualifications of the staff. They must eliminate or reduce the risk through safe use and disposal procedures, the immediate prohibition of re-encapsulation, the provision of clearly marked disposal containers located as close as possible to the point of use, and the provision of medical devices with integrated protective mechanisms, removing conventional devices once safe ones are implemented. These measures must be adopted with the consultation and participation of workers’ representatives.

The standard requires training and information on the correct use of devices, exposure risks, prevention measures, notification procedures, and how to respond to injuries, with mandatory training for all personnel, including temporary and trainee staff. Free vaccination against biological agents with an effective vaccine must be offered, with written documentation of acceptance or refusal. In the event of an accident, the individual must report it immediately, and the employer must investigate the causes, ensure medical attention, post-exposure prophylaxis when appropriate, and subsequent health surveillance, record the incident confidentially, and implement corrective measures.

Effective preventive measures

  • Safety devices. Needles and catheters with active or passive protection systems, safety scalpels, retractable lancets, and needle-free connection systems.
  • Safe procedures. Do not recap, do not disassemble needles by hand, transport instruments on trays, transfer hands-free in the operating room, and dispose of immediately in the container.
  • Containers. Rigid, marked, with controlled closure and maximum fill level, located at the point of use and on treatment and extraction carts.
  • Training and supervision. Hands-on training with real devices, regular reinforcement and supervision of practices, especially for new staff.
  • Vaccination and health surveillance. Hepatitis B vaccination and serological and clinical follow-up after exposures.
  • Notification and analysis. Accessible and non-blaming notification system, exposure logging, and root cause analysis to improve devices and procedures.

Organizational application: how to prevent injuries from sharp objects

  1. Evaluate the risks by unit and procedure, with the participation of professionals and worker safety representatives, identifying the tasks, devices and practices of greatest risk.
  2. Implement medical devices with safety mechanisms in all procedures where they exist, remove conventional ones, and verify their acceptance and correct use.
  3. Establish safe use and disposal procedures, prohibit re-encapsulation, and place rigid, labeled containers at the point of use, with filling control.
  4. Train all staff, including temporary and trainee staff, with practical exercises on real devices and regular reinforcements.
  5. Offer and document vaccination, and establish the protocol for action in case of accidents with immediate attention, post-exposure prophylaxis and follow-up.
  6. Implement the exposure notification and recording system, investigate each accident, and take corrective action.
  7. Periodically analyze exposure data, review the assessment and measures, and communicate the results to the staff.

Preventive management software allows for the recording and analysis of exposures by unit, procedure, and device with the required confidentiality, the management of the post-exposure protocol and the monitoring of health surveillance, the control of vaccination and training of all personnel, and the traceability of corrective measures and the implementation of safety devices.

Limits and common mistakes

  1. Maintaining conventional devices due to cost or habit when alternatives with safety mechanisms exist.
  2. Tolerate recapping or manual removal of needles in urgent situations.
  3. Having insufficient containers, containers far from the point of use, or containers filled above the limit.
  4. Train only permanent staff and forget about temporary staff, newly hired staff, and staff from external cleaning and waste management companies.
  5. Underreporting accidents due to fear, lack of time or lack of knowledge of the procedure, which hinders monitoring and improvement.
  6. Failure to investigate the organizational causes (workload, shifts, supervision) that are behind the injuries.

Specific post-exposure protocols depend on prevention services and health authorities; this information sheet is for informational purposes only.

Practical example

Situation: A regional hospital detects a spike in needle sticks in the emergency room and in the blood draw unit, with several cases not reported until days later.

  • Analysis. The prevention service reviews the records, interviews the staff and verifies that needles without safety mechanisms are used in extractions, that the containers are far from the cubicles and that temporary staff are unaware of the notification procedure.
  • Measures. Needles and catheters are replaced with devices with integrated protection, containers are installed in each treatment cubicle and trolley, the prohibition of recapping is reinforced, and an immediate notification circuit is established with emergency care and post-exposure prophylaxis.
  • Training. Practical training with the new devices is provided to all staff, including temporary staff during their induction, with reinforcement every six months and supervision of the practical exercises.
  • Follow-up. Notification increases initially due to improved record-keeping, injuries decrease in subsequent months, and the quarterly analysis of exposures is integrated into the safety and health committee.

Regulatory and reference framework

Order ESS/1451/2013 applies to all staff in the health and hospital sector, public and private, including temporary and trainee staff, and its measures are adopted with the participation of workers’ representatives.

Related concepts

References

  1. Official State Gazette. Order ESS/1451/2013, of July 29, establishing provisions for the prevention of injuries caused by sharp and pointed instruments in the healthcare and hospital sector. 2013. Official source
  2. European Union. Council Directive 2010/32/EU of 10 May 2010 implementing the Framework Agreement for the prevention of injuries caused by sharp and pointed instruments in the hospital and healthcare sector concluded by HOSPEEM and EPSU. 2010. Official source
  3. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 664/1997, of May 12, on the protection of workers against risks related to exposure to biological agents at work. 1997, current consolidated text. Official source
  4. Official State Gazette. Law 31/1995, of November 8, on Occupational Risk Prevention. 1995, current consolidated text. Official source
  5. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 773/1997, of May 30, on minimum health and safety requirements for the use of personal protective equipment by workers. 1997, current consolidated text. Official source
  6. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 1299/2006, of November 10, approving the schedule of occupational diseases in the Social Security system. 2006, current consolidated text. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: August 30, 2026 .

Editorial Manager: Sabentis Editorial Team .

Editorial review by Pablo Rodríguez LinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra